For most insurance agencies, quoting a home or commercial property still requires jumping between half a dozen sources: Zillow for photos, FEMA for flood maps, Google for street and satellite view, county portals for ownership and updates, and a mix of hazard tools for fire risk, protection class, or local exposure. The result? Slow workflows, inconsistent data, and unnecessary back-and-forth just to get a clear picture of what a property actually  looks like. Agencies don’t

Insurance agencies that write homeowners and commercial property policies all run into the same operational bottleneck: you can’t scale submissions if you can’t trust the property data you’re working with. Every quoting workflow—whether personal lines, small commercial, or complex coastal risks—ultimately depends on accurate property data. But most producers and account managers still bounce manually between: Property listing sites County portals FEMA flood maps Google search

When quoting a home, insurance agents typically go to Zillow for photos, basic details, and sometimes even clues about roof material. It’s familiar, fast, and free — which is why producers naturally start there when they’re building a submission from scratch. But there’s a hard limit to how far Zillow (or any real estate listing site) can take an insurance professional. It was never designed for underwriting, and it shows the moment you try to answer the questions that actual

When quoting a property—whether it’s a single-family home or a multi-building commercial complex—one of the most common questions is: ...